4.6 Article

Evidence of reproductive cost in the triphasic life history of the red alga Gracilaria chilensis (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta)

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYCOLOGY
卷 26, 期 1, 页码 569-575

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10811-013-0072-x

关键词

Short-term reproductive cost; Dioecy; Gametophyte; Sporophyte; Carposporophyte; Haplodiploidy; Photosynthesis

资金

  1. CONICYT
  2. FONDECYT [1090360]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The extent of changes in basic physiological and demographic traits associated with reproduction was investigated in the highly cultivated haploid-diploid red alga, Gracilaria chilensis. Sixty individuals bearing vegetative and reproductive fronds collected in the natural population of Niebla (39A degrees 52'aEuro parts per thousand S, 73A degrees 23'aEuro parts per thousand W), in Chile, were cultivated under controlled culture conditions. Our results demonstrated that vegetative fronds have a higher survival rate and a better growth rate than reproductive ones irrespective of the type of individual analyzed (male gametophyte, female gametophyte, and tetrasporophyte). Moreover, the reproductive fronds clearly showed a decrease in photosynthetic activity compared to non-reproductive ones. In males and tetrasporophytes, the photosynthetic reduction in reproductive individuals could be explained by a physical effect of reproductive structure development as well as spores release, disrupting the continuity of the photosynthetic cortical tissues. Translocation of photoassimilates from nearby vegetative tissue or the previous accumulation of photosynthetic products seems to be a prerequisite for reproductive structure development in this species. Altogether, these results document for the first time in G. chilensis that reproduction has a strong physiological effect on male, female, and tetrasporophyte fronds. This trade-off between reproduction, growth, and survival suggest the existence of reproductive costs in the life history of G. chilensis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据