4.6 Article

Utilization of cane molasses towards cost-saving astaxanthin production by a Chlorella zofingiensis mutant

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYCOLOGY
卷 25, 期 5, 页码 1447-1456

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10811-013-9974-x

关键词

Astaxanthin; Chlorella zofingiensis mutant; Fed-batch; Molasses; Semi-continuous

资金

  1. 985 Project of Peking University
  2. State Oceanic Administration of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the present study was to survey the growth and astaxanthin production of E17, an astaxanthin-rich mutant of Chlorella zofingiensis, through feeding the low-cost carbon source cane molasses. In heterotrophic batch cultivation, E17 fed with pretreated molasses achieved biomass (1.79 g L-1 day(-1)) and astaxanthin (1.99 mg L-1 day(-1)) productivities comparable to those with glucose, which were about 2- and 2.8-fold of those fed with untreated molasses, respectively. Molasses-induced astaxanthin accumulation may be attributed to the elicited expression of carotenogenic genes, in particular the genes specifically responsible for the ketolation and hydroxylation of beta-carotene to form astaxanthin. A two-stage fed-batch strategy was employed to grow E17 and induce astaxathin accumulation, resulting in 45.6 g L-1 biomass and 56.1 mg L-1 astaxanthin, the highest volumetric astaxanthin yield ever reported for this alga. In addition, the astaxanthin production by E17 was tested with a semi-continuous culture method, where the directly diluted raw molasses (giving 5 g L-1 sugar) was used as the carbon source. Little growth inhibition of E17 was observed in the semi-continuous culture with a biomass productivity of 1.33 g L-1 day(-1) and an astaxanthin productivity of 0.83 mg L-1 day(-1). The mixotrophic semi-continuous cultures enhanced the biomass and astaxanthin productivities by 29.3 % and 42.2 %, respectively. This study highlights the potential of using the industrially cheap cane molasses towards large-scale cost-saving production of the high-value ketocarotenoid astaxanthin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据