4.6 Article

Spatial and temporal variations of Chondrus crispus (Gigartinaceae, Rhodophyta) carrageenan content in natural populations from Galicia (NW Spain)

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYCOLOGY
卷 24, 期 4, 页码 941-951

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10811-011-9715-y

关键词

Chondrus crispus; Gametophyte; Tetrasporophyte; Carrageenan; Oceanographic variables; Environmental variables

资金

  1. Carrasea Project of the European programme Aquareg (Interreg III-C)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Qualitative and quantitative differences in carrageenan composition of gametophytes and tetrasporophytes of Chondrus crispus were observed in this study. Carrageenans in gametophytes belong to the kappa family (kappa-, iota-, nu- and mu-carrageenan). The dominant fractions were kappa- and iota-carrageenan (more than 50% of the total carrageenans). In tetrasporophytes, the presence of lambda-carrageenan was confirmed. Carrageenan content in gametophytes (37.4 +/- 1.68% DW) was higher than in tetrasporophytes (29.13 +/- 0.76% DW). Spatial and temporal variation in carrageenan content in both life cycle phases appears to be related mainly to seawater and air temperatures, insolation, water movement and desiccation. The highest values of carrageenan content were recorded in those localities where higher values of precipitation, wind speed or water movement occurred. A bimodal temporal pattern on carrageenan content was observed. Fronds showed a high carrageenan content in spring and autumn. During these seasons, the content was over 40% in gametophytes and 30% in the tetrasporophytes. In summer and winter, these values down in both life cycle phases below 30%. In general the highest carrageenan contents were related to highest seawater temperatures. On the contrary, high air temperature and high insolation appeared to be unfavourable for carrageenan production. GLM models were obtained to predict carrageenan production from natural C. crispus populations, along Galician coast.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据