4.6 Article

Management and production of the brown algae Ascophyllum nodosum in the Canadian maritimes

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYCOLOGY
卷 24, 期 3, 页码 409-416

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10811-011-9753-5

关键词

Ascophyllum nodosum; Rockweed; Seaweed harvest; Seaweed resource management

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Commercial exploitation of (rockweed) along the coast of Nova Scotia began in the late 1950s when it was used as a raw material for manufacturing alginate and kelp meal. Today, this resource is used as a biostimulant extract for crops and animal feed supplements and is the main economic resource of the seaweed industry in the Maritime Provinces and Canada. The management of rockweed, by dividing the resource into many sectors, permitted the assessment of yield per unit area of bed. In Nova Scotia, mechanical harvesting of operated on a pulse of 2- to 3-year schedule providing yields of 21.9 to 47.7 wet t ha(-1) averaging 35.3 +/- 7.6 wet t ha(-1). Acadian Seaplants Limited (ASL) has become the dominant player in the region since 1995 with more than 75% of the total biomass under its leases and more than 90% of the total landing of rockweed in the last 13 years. Sustained harvests at ASL leases and under an annual harvest schedule using hand cutting methods have averaged 17.4 +/- 2.6 t ha(-1). Exploitation rates above 35% of the harvestable crop lead to a pulse harvest strategy and the need to move infrastructure year after year. In New Brunswick, a new approach to management began in 1995 with a regulated 17% exploitation rate. Thus, the yield in that province is 14.3 wet t ha(-1). The current summer standing crop for this region has been calculated at 352,723 wet t, covering an area of 4,960 ha, with an average biomass of 71.3 t ha(-1). The harvest in the region reached peak landings in 2010 with just over 40,100 t. The consistent yield per hectare of beds is proof of good management practices and an ecologically sustainable harvest in the Canadian Maritimes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据