4.6 Article

Selection and characterization of a Patagonian Pichia kudriavzevii for wine deacidification

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 117, 期 2, 页码 451-464

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jam.12547

关键词

indigenous Saccharomyces cerevisiae; malic acid; nonSaccharomyces diversity; wine aroma; wine yeast

资金

  1. Universidad Nacional del Comahue [04 l001]
  2. MINCyT [PICT SU 2804/12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: The purpose of this study was to select autochthonous yeasts with metabolic ability to degrade L-malic acid for its potential use in young wine deacidification. Methods and Results: Fifty seven Patagonian nonSaccharomyces yeast of oenological origin were identified by conventional molecular methods and tested in their capability to grow at the expense of L-malic acid. Only four isolates belonging to Pichia kudriavzevii species showed this property, and one of them was selected to continue with the study. This isolate, named as P. kudriavzevii (N) over tilde NI15, was able to degrade L-malic acid in microvinifications, increasing the pH 0.2-0.3 units with a minimal effect on the acid structure of wine. Additionally, this isolate produced low levels of ethanol, important levels of glycerol (10.41 +/- 0.48 g l(-1)) and acceptable amounts of acetic acid (0.86 +/- 0.13 g l(-1)). In addition, it improved the sensorial attributes of wine increasing its fruity aroma. Conclusions: The selection of yeasts for oenological use among nonSaccharomyces species led to the finding of a yeast strain with novel and interesting oenological characteristics which could have significant implications in the production of well-balanced and more physicochemical and microbiological stable young wines. Significance and Impact of the Study: The use of P. kudriavzevii (N) over tilde NI15 as mixed starter with S. cerevisiae would eliminate the cultural and cellar operations undertaken to adjust the musts acidity, therefore improving wine quality and reducing production costs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据