4.6 Article

Hypocrea lixii, novel endophytic fungi producing anticancer agent cajanol, isolated from pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan [L.] Millsp.)

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 115, 期 1, 页码 102-113

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jam.12195

关键词

cajanol; Cajanus cajan; cytotoxicity activity; Hypocrea lixii; ITS and -tubulin gene sequence; LC-MS; MS

资金

  1. Program for Importation of International Advanced Forestry Science and Technology
  2. National Forestry Bureau [2012-4-06]
  3. Special Fund of Forestry Industrial Research for Public Welfare of China [201004040]
  4. Heilongjiang Province Science Foundation for Excellent Youths [JC200704]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims The aim was to isolate, identify and characterize endophytes from pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan [L.] Millsp.), as novel producer of cajanol and its in vitro cytotoxicity assay. Methods and Results Isolation, identification and characterization of novel endophytes producing cajanol from the roots of pigeon pea were investigated. The endophytes were identified as Hypocrea lixii by morphological and molecular methods. Cajanol produced by endophytes were quantified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). R-18 produced the highest levels of cajanol (322 center dot 4 +/- 10 center dot 6gl-1 or 102 center dot 8 +/- 6 center dot 9gg-1 dry weight of mycelium) after incubation for 7days. The cytotoxicity towards human lung carcinoma cells (A549) of fungal cajanol was investigated in vitro. Conclusions First, a novel endophyte Hypocrea lixii, producing anticancer agent cajanol, was isolated from the host pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan [L.] Millsp.). Fungal cajanol possessed stronger cytotoxicity activity towards A549 cells in time- and dose-dependent manners. Significance and Impact of the Study This endophyte is a potential handle for scientific and commercial exploitation, and it could provide a promising alterative approach for large-scale production of cajanol to satisfy new anticancer drug development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据