4.6 Article

Monosaccharide composition of the outer membrane lipopolysaccharide and O-chain from the freshwater cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa NIES-87

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 113, 期 4, 页码 896-903

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05405.x

关键词

chemical characterization; lipopolysaccharide; Microcystis aeruginosa; O-chain

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [23760501]
  2. [21656130]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23760501] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims Bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) protruding from the outermost layer of the outer membrane is expected to play an important role in cell physiology by interacting with molecules in the extracellular milieu; however, the structural and functional characteristics of these components in cyanobacteria remain largely unknown. We isolated water-soluble fractions of LPS and O-chain from the bloom-forming freshwater cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa NIES-87 and identified their monosaccharide compositions. Methods and Results SDS-PAGE followed by silver staining demonstrated that the isolated total LPS was the smooth type with different numbers of repeating sugar units in the O-chain region. GC/MS analysis after acid hydrolysis, reduction and acetylation treatments indicated that the neutral monosaccharide components of the total LPS include glucose, rhamnose, mannose, galactose and xylose (in decreasing order of weight percentage), while only glucose was detected in the purified O-chain fraction. MALDI-TOF MS analysis suggested that the O-chain fraction is composed of repeating glucose and methylated glucose disaccharide units. Conclusions Our results indicate that the monosaccharide composition of M. aeruginosa O-chain is relatively simple. Significance and Impact of the Study Although further studies are necessary, these findings provide fundamental information for understanding the structural and functional properties of cyanobacterial LPS and O-chain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据