4.6 Article

Characterization of rumen bacterial diversity and fermentation parameters in concentrate fed cattle with and without forage

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 112, 期 6, 页码 1152-1162

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05295.x

关键词

DDGS; DGGE; pH; real-time PCR; rumen bacteria diversity; Shannon-Weiner; Simpson's Index

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: To determine the effects of the removal of forage in high-concentrate diets on rumen fermentation conditions and rumen bacterial populations using culture-independent methods. Methods and Results: Detectable bacteria and fermentation parameters were measured in the solid and liquid fractions of digesta from cattle fed two dietary treatments, high concentrate (HC) and high concentrate without forage (HCNF). Comparison of rumen fermentation conditions showed that duration of time spent below pH 5.2 and rumen osmolality were higher in the HCNF treatment. Simpsons index of 16S PCR-DGGE images showed a greater diversity of dominant species in the HCNF treatment. Real-time qPCR showed populations of Fibrobacter succinogenes (P = 0.01) were lower in HCNF than HC diets. Ruminococcus spp., F.similar to succinogenes and Selenomonas ruminantium were at higher (P = 0.05) concentrations in the solid vs the liquid fraction of digesta regardless of diet. Conclusions: The detectable bacterial community structure in the rumen is highly diverse. Reducing diet complexity by removing forage increased bacterial diversity despite the associated reduction in ruminal pH being less conducive for fibrolytic bacterial populations. Quantitative PCR showed that removal of forage from the diet resulted in a decline in the density of some, but not all fibrolytic bacterial species examined. Significance and Impact of the Study: Molecular techniques such as DGGE and qPCR provide an increased understanding of the impacts of dietary changes on the nature of rumen bacterial populations, and conclusions derived using these techniques may not match those previously derived using traditional laboratory culturing techniques.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据