4.6 Article

Use of ceramic-based cell immobilization to produce 1,3-propanediol from biodiesel-derived waste glycerol with Klebsiella pneumoniae

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 111, 期 5, 页码 1138-1147

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05137.x

关键词

1,3-propanediol; ceramic balls; ceramic rings; immobilization; Kl. pneumoniae

资金

  1. TUBITAK-CAYDAG [109Y150]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: The feasibility of the continuous production of a valuable bioplastic raw material, namely 1,3-propanediol (1,3-PDO) from biodiesel by-product glycerol, using immobilized cells was investigated. In addition, the effect of hydraulic retention time (HRT) was also analysed. Methods and Results: Ceramic balls and ceramic rings were used for the immobilization of a locally isolated strain; Klebsiella pneumoniae (GenBank no. 27F HM063413). HRT of 1 h is the best one in terms of volumetric production rate (g 1,3-PDO l(-1) h(-1)). The results indicated that ceramic-based cell immobilization achieved a 2-fold higher production rate (10 g 1,3-PDO l(-1) h(-1)) in comparison with suspended cell system (4 9 g 1,3-PDO l(-1) h(-1)). Conclusions: Continuous cultures with immobilized cells revealed that 1,3-PDO production was more effective and more stable than suspended culture systems. Furthermore, cell immobilization had also obvious benefits especially for resistance of the production for extreme conditions (high organic loading rates, cell washouts). The results were important for understanding the significance of continuous immobilization process among other well-known 1,3-PDO fermentation processes. Significance and Impact of the Study: This work is a promising process for further studies, as the immobilized micro-organism was able to reach high volumetric production rates at short HRT, it has an important role in tolerating and converting glycerol during fermentation. Therefore, HRT is a very significant operational parameter (P value < 0 05) directly affecting the bioreactor performance and production rate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据