4.6 Article

Effects of ozone on membrane permeability and ultrastructure in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 111, 期 4, 页码 1006-1015

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05113.x

关键词

adenosine triphosphate; magnesium; membrane permeability; ozone; potassium; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; ultrastructural alteration

资金

  1. Guangdong provincial science and technology plan project, China [2009B030500003]
  2. Guangdong provincial scientific and technological major special project [2009A080209002]
  3. Guangdong Provincial & Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) [2009A091 100019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: To examine the mechanism of ozone-induced damage to cytoplasmic membrane and cell ultrastructure of Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC27853. Methods and Results: Cell suspensions of Ps. aeruginosa ATCC27853 were treated with ozonated water. The leakages of cellular potassium (K+), magnesium (Mg2+) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP), determined by inductively coupled plasma/mass spectrometry (ICP/MS) and a commercial bioluminescence assay kit, were to assess ozone-induced damage to the cytoplasmic membrane. Maximum leakages of K+ and Mg2+ were attained, respectively, at 0.53 mg l(-1) ozone after 0.5 and 2 min with >99% inactivation of culturable bacteria, while that of ATP was achieved at 0.67 mg l(-1) ozone after 1 min. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed that treated cells retained intact shapes and cytoplasm agglutinations and vacuoles occurred. Conclusions: Ozone inactivates Ps. aeruginosa ATCC27853 by the combined results of increased cytoplasmic membrane permeability and cytoplasm coagulation, rather than by severe membrane disruption and cell lysis. Significance and Impact of the Study: Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a common water-related pathogen. These insights into the leakage of cytoplasmic components and ultrastructural changes provide evidence for the mechanisms of ozone-mediated inactivation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据