4.6 Article

A validated miniaturized MPN method, based on ISO 6579:2002, for the enumeration of Salmonella from poultry matrices

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 109, 期 1, 页码 25-34

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04649.x

关键词

ISO 6579:2002; matrices; miniaturization enumeration; most probable number; poultry; Salmonella; validations

资金

  1. Baiada Poultry Pty Ltd Sydney, Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: To validate the effectiveness of a miniaturized most probable number method (mMPN) in enumerating Salmonella from poultry matrices. Methods and Results: A MPN was developed, based on the ISO 6579:2002 method using modified semi-solid Rappaport-Vassiliadis media as the sole selective medium. The validation of the mMPN was shown to not differ significantly from, at the 95% confidence level (Student's t-test P = 0 center dot 357) to, the traditional 9-tube MPN (tMPN) using pure cultures of Salmonella ser. Typhimurium, Infantis, Montevideo, Muenster and Salmonella subsp II 1,4,12,27:b:[e,n,x] (Sofia). The validation of naturally and artificially contaminated poultry matrices (carcasses, scald tank water, faeces, caeca and feed) showed that detection using the mMPN compared well to the ISO 6572:2002; sensitivity (92%), specificity (97%) and agreement (KAPPA 0 center dot 72). The quantitative comparison between the tMPN and mMPN methods showed that 92% of enumerations were less than +/- 1 log different (Student's t-test = 0 center dot 13). Financial analysis showed that the mMPN required 64% less media and 56% less labour than the tMPN. Conclusion: The mMPN is a consistent, easy to automate method for the enumeration of Salmonella from different poultry matrices. Significance and Impact of Study: The miniaturized MPN reduces the material and labour cost of the method and enables the uniform and accurate measurement of the effectiveness of intervention strategies in the control of Salmonella colonization of poultry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据