4.6 Article

Alginate-deriving oligosaccharide production by alginase from newly isolated Flavobacterium sp LXA and its potential application in protection against pathogens

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 106, 期 1, 页码 161-170

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03988.x

关键词

alginase; alginate; alginate degradation; algino-oligosaccharide; elicitor activity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Liaoning Education Department
  3. Liaoning Scientific Funding of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To examine algino-oligosaccharide production by alginase from newly isolated Flavobacterium sp. LXA and its elicitor and antibacterial activity. Algino-oligosaccharide production from alginate was carried out using alginase obtained from a newly isolated Flavobacterium sp. LXA. When alginase was partially purified by dual ammonium sulfate precipitation and used for alginate degradation, the viscosity loss correlated well with the release of reducing terminals. The optimal temperature and pH for alginate degradation was 40 degrees C and pH 7.0, respectively. When alginate was added at an initial concentration of more than 0.8%, the maximal degradation rate of alginate was obtained. Under these optimal reaction conditions and with partially purified alginase, the average degrees of polymerization (DP) of alginate-degraded products was about 6.0, which favoured algino-oligosaccharide production. The algino-oligosaccharides showed an elicitor activity stimulating the accumulation of phytoalexin and inducing phenylalanine ammonia lyase in soybean cotyledon, and antimicrobial activity on Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Algino-oligosaccharide could be degraded from alginate by the partially purified alginase and its maximal bioactivity occurred on the oligosaccharide with average DP 6.8. Algino-oligosaccharide was first reported to have elicitor and antibacterial activity and have potential as a biological agent for protection against plant or human disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据