4.6 Article

Differentiation of typical and atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli using colony immunoblot for detection of bundle-forming pilus expression

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 109, 期 1, 页码 35-43

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04625.x

关键词

bundle-forming pilus; enteropathogenic E; coli; expression; immunodetection; rabbit polyclonal antiserum

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo [04/12136-5]
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [04/12136-5] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: The aim of study was to develop a colony immunoblot assay to differentiate typical from atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) by detection of bundle-forming pilus (BFP) expression. Methods and Results: Anti-BFP antiserum was raised in rabbits and its reactivity was confirmed by immunoelectron microscopy and by immunoblotting recognizing bundlin, the major pilus repeating subunit. The bacterial isolates tested in the colony immunoblot assay were grown in different media. Proteins from bacterial isolates were transferred to nitrocellulose membrane after treatment with phosphate buffer containing Triton X-100, EDTA and sodium chloride salts. When 24 typical EPEC and 96 isolates including, 72 atypical EPEC, 13 Gram-negative type IV-expressing strains and 11 enterobacteriaceae were cultivated in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium agar containing fetal bovine serum or in blood agar in the presence of CaCl(2), they showed a positivity of 92 and 83%, and specificity of 96 and 97%, respectively. Conclusion: The assay enables reliable identification of BFP-expressing isolates and contributes to the differentiation of typical and atypical EPEC. Significance and Impact of the Study: The colony immunoblot for BFP detection developed in this study combines the simplicity of an immunoserological assay with the high efficiency of testing a large number of EPEC colonies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据