4.6 Article

Autochthonous bacterial flora indicated by PCR-DGGE of 16S rRNA gene fragments from the alimentary tract of Costelytra zealandica (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae)

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 105, 期 5, 页码 1277-1285

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03867.x

关键词

bacteria; Costelytra zealandica; insect gut; microbial community; PCR-DGGE

资金

  1. Marsden Fund of New Zealand
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30671404]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: To locate and identify putative autochthonous bacteria within the grass grub gut that may have a role in symbiosis. Methods and Results: Polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) fingerprinting was used to investigate bacterial diversity in the grass grub larval gut. The microbial community profiles from five geographically distinct populations were compared and the influence of feeding was analysed. Bacterial community in the midgut was highly variable between locations and was affected by feeding. The hindgut contained a more diverse but stable bacterial community that was less affected by external conditions. Forty-seven distinct DGGE bands, representing different bacterial genotypes, could be distinguished from all samples, with 34 different bands occurring in the hindgut. The 22 most common bands were isolated and DNA was sequenced. Sequence analysis revealed that most bacteria (16/22) were affiliated to the Clostridiales with the predominant bacteria affiliated to the genus Clostridium. The remaining bacteria were aligned to the Betaproteobacteria, Deltaproteobacteria and Bacteroidetes. Conclusions: The grass grub larva has an autochthonous microflora with predominance of Clostridium spp. in the hindgut. Significance and Impact of the Study: Occurrence of an autocthonous microflora in the grass grub hindgut suggests a symbiotic relationship which could help explain the ability of larval scarabs to feed on recalcitrant organic matter.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据