4.4 Article

Large-Eddy Simulations of Air Flow and Turbulence within and around Low-Aspect-Ratio Cylindrical Open-Top Chambers

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY
卷 52, 期 8, 页码 1716-1737

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JAMC-D-12-041.1

关键词

Airflow; Mixing; Turbulence; Vegetation-atmosphere interactions; Large eddy simulations; Biosphere-atmosphere interaction

资金

  1. Regional Climate Impacts project
  2. Next Generation Ecosystem Experiments (NGEE Arctic) project
  3. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The flow around cylindrical open-top chambers (OTCs) with aspect ratios (i.e., height-to-diameter ratios) much less than unity is investigated using a large-eddy simulation (LES) model. The solid structures are represented using the immersed boundary method, and the ambient flow in which the OTCs are embedded is representative of a turbulent atmospheric boundary layer. Results from the LES model show that the flow inside OTCs depends strongly on the height of the chamber wall. In particular, as chamber height increases the flow impinging on the upstream wall is deflected more in the vertical direction, a stronger recirculation flow develops inside the chamber, turbulence intensities are greater, and there is stronger vertical transport and mixing within the OTC, even at or near the ground. For low wall heights (i.e., very low aspect ratios), however, the flow impinging on the OTC is only diverted weakly in the vertical direction; aside from a small recirculation zone inside the OTC near the upstream wall and a small region near the downstream wall as the flow separates from the ground, there is minimal vertical mixing and the turbulence intensities are small. The results of these simulations, while general in nature, are particularly relevant to design considerations for manipulative field experiments in highly heterogeneous, low-stature ecosystems such as Arctic shrubs and grasses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据