4.4 Article

Reconstruction of a Daily Large-Pan Evaporation Dataset over China

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY
卷 51, 期 7, 页码 1265-1275

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JAMC-D-11-0123.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. 973 project Assessment, Assimilation, Recompilation and Applications of Fundamental and Thematic Climate Data Records [2010CB951600]
  2. Meteorological Data Sharing Center under Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2005DKA31700]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Land surface evaporation is an important component of the earth's surface hydrological cycle, as well as in the atmospheric energy and water balances. In China, different instruments have been used over time to measure evaporation. A small pan with 20-cm diameter was used at most meteorological stations from 1951 to 2002. After 1998, large pans with areas of 3000 cm(2) each were adopted at most stations. Collocated small- and large-pan observations of evaporation have been made at major stations from 1998 to 2002. This makes developing a homogenous time series of evaporation measurements difficult. This paper describes how surface evaporation data collected in the past are merged with more recent data collected by automated weather stations. A statistical model was set up on the basis of collocated small- and large-pan observations of evaporation, using a second-generation statistical regression technique [partial least squares (PLS)]. The model succeeds in generating daily large-pan evaporation estimates from small-pan evaporation data and selected meteorological parameters. Interpolation is used to replace missing data. The reconstructed large-pan evaporation dataset covers 751 weather stations across China from 1951 to 2005. Cross-validation tests show that the relative error of the daily estimated evaporation derived from the PLS regression model is 19% with a monthly mean error rate approaching 0 mm. The spatial distribution and interannual-interdecadal trends of the reconstructed large-pan evaporation dataset and small-pan observations are similar.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据