4.4 Article

An Automated, Objective, Multiple-Satellite-Platform Tropical Cyclone Surface Wind Analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY
卷 50, 期 10, 页码 2149-2166

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/2011JAMC2673.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. NOAA [NA17RJ1228]
  2. GOES Improved Measurements and Products Assurance Plan (GIMPAP)
  3. GOES Product Services Development and Improvement (PSDI) program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A method to estimate objectively the surface wind fields associated with tropical cyclones using only data from multiple satellite platforms and satellite-based wind retrieval techniques is described. The analyses are computed on a polar grid using a variational data-fitting method that allows for the application of variable data weights to input data. The combination of gross quality control and the weighted variational analysis also produces wind estimates that have generally smaller errors than do the raw input data. The resulting surface winds compare well to the NOAA Hurricane Research Division H*Wind aircraft reconnaissance based surface wind analyses, and operationally important wind radii estimated from these wind fields are shown to be generally more accurate than those based on climatological data. Most important, the analysis system produces global tropical cyclone surface wind analyses and related products every 6 h-without aircraft reconnaissance data. Also, the analysis and products are available in time for consideration by forecasters at the Joint Typhoon Warning Center, the Central Pacific Hurricane Center, and the National Hurricane Center in preparing their forecasts and advisories. This Multiplatform Tropical Cyclone Surface Wind Analysis (MTCSWA) product is slated to become an operationally supported product at the National Environmental Satellite Data and Information Service (NESDIS). The input data, analysis method, products, and verification statistics associated with the MTCSWA are discussed within.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据