4.4 Article

Local-Scale Urban Meteorological Parameterization Scheme (LUMPS): Longwave Radiation Parameterization and Seasonality-Related Developments

期刊

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/2010JAMC2474.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [ATM-0710631, BCS-0221105, BCS-0095284]
  2. EU BRIDGE [FP7-ENV-2007-1 211345]
  3. Met Office
  4. USDA Forest Service [CA-11242343-082, 04-CA-11242343-124, 05-CA-11242343-11]
  5. King's College London
  6. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [0937777] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent developments to the Local-scale Urban Meteorological Parameterization Scheme (LUMPS), a simple model able to simulate the urban energy balance, are presented. The major development is the coupling of LUMPS to the Net All-Wave Radiation Parameterization (NARP). Other enhancements include that the model now accounts for the changing availability of water at the surface, seasonal variations of active vegetation, and the anthropogenic heat flux, while maintaining the need for only commonly available meteorological observations and basic surface characteristics. The incoming component of the longwave radiation (L down arrow) in NARP is improved through a simple relation derived using cloud cover observations from a ceilometer collected in central London, England. The new L down arrow formulation is evaluated with two independent multiyear datasets (Lodz, Poland, and Baltimore, Maryland) and compared with alternatives that include the original NARP and a simpler one using the National Climatic Data Center cloud observation database as input. The performance for the surface energy balance fluxes is assessed using a 2-yr dataset (Lodz). Results have an overall RMSE <34 W m(-2) for all surface energy balance fluxes over the 2-yr period when using L down arrow as forcing, and RMSE < 43 W m(-2) for all seasons in 2002 with all other options implemented to model L down arrow.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据