4.8 Article

A noisy linear map underlies oscillations in cell size and gene expression in bacteria

期刊

NATURE
卷 523, 期 7560, 页码 357-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature14562

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01GM098642, R01GM110494]
  3. DuPont Young Professorship
  4. David and Lucile Packard Fellowship
  5. DARPA Biochronicity Grant [DARPA-BAA-11-66]
  6. NIH [DP2 OD008654-01]
  7. Burroughs Wellcome Fund [BWF 1005769.01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During bacterial growth, a cell approximately doubles in size before division, after which it splits into two daughter cells. This process is subjected to the inherent perturbations of cellular noise(1,2) and thus requires regulation for cell-size homeostasis. The mechanisms underlying the control and dynamics of cell size remain poorly understood owing to the difficulty in sizing individual bacteria over long periods of time in a high-throughput manner. Here we measure and analyse long-term, single-cell growth and division across different Escherichia coli strains and growth conditions(3). We show that a subset of cells in a population exhibit transient oscillations in cell size with periods that stretch across several (more than ten) generations. Our analysis reveals that a simple law governing cell-size control-a noisy linear map-explains the origins of these cell-size oscillations across all strains. This noisy linear map implements a negative feedback on cell-size control: a cell with a larger initial size tends to divide earlier, whereas one with a smaller initial size tends to divide later. Combining simulations of cell growth and division with experimental data, we demonstrate that this noisy linear map generates transient oscillations, not just in cell size, but also in constitutive gene expression. Our work provides new insights into the dynamics of bacterial cell-size regulation with implications for the physiological processes involved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据