4.4 Article

Attenuation at low seismic frequencies in partially saturated rocks: Measurements and description of a new apparatus

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
卷 86, 期 -, 页码 44-53

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2012.07.008

关键词

Seismic attenuation; Low seismic frequencies; Sub-resonance method; Berea sandstone; Squirt flow; Partial fluid saturation

资金

  1. Swiss Innovation Promotion Agency (KTI) [22701]
  2. Spectraseis AG

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wave attenuation at low seismic frequencies (0.1-100 Hz) in the earth crust has been explained by stress-induced fluid flow in partially saturated porous media. We present the pressure vessel called Broad Band Attenuation Vessel (BBAV) and two series of attenuation (Q(E)(-1)) measurements conducted on Berea sandstone. The BBAV employs the sub-resonance method to measure seismic wave attenuation in the frequency range from 0.01 to 100 Hz, under confining pressure up to 25 MPa and generating a bulk strain around 10(-6) in a cylindrical sample with maximum size of 76 mm in diameter and 250 mm in length. The BBAV has been successfully designed, built and tested. The calibrations obtained with aluminum (EN AW-6082) and Polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA or Plexiglas) agree with literature values. Two 20% porosity and 1.97 x 10(-13) -9.87 x 10(-13) m(2) permeability Berea sandstone samples were tested. The stress conditions were: i) unconfined, ii) confined at 2 MPa and iii) confined at 15 MPa. Dry samples exhibited always attenuation around 0.01, while saturated samples exhibited attenuation between 0.01 and 0.04. Attenuation values in >= 60% water saturated samples were frequency-dependent only for confining pressure <= 2 MPa. One explanation to this observation, which requires more experiments to be established, is that for confining pressures >10 MPa the microcracks in the sample would be closed, impeding attenuation related to squirt flow. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据