4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Electrokinetic removal of chloride and sodium from tidelands

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED ELECTROCHEMISTRY
卷 40, 期 6, 页码 1139-1144

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10800-010-0082-1

关键词

Tidelands; Electrokinetic remediation; Salinity; Electromigration; Ionic mobility; Solubility

资金

  1. Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) [0520101700300130] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  2. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [2Z03400] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A laboratory-scale investigation was carried out to study the characteristics of electrokinetic (EK) movement for separation of salts from tideland. The salinity of tideland material, including the sodium and chloride contents, was investigated as a function of operation time under a constant voltage gradient of 1 V/cm. As the operation period increased, the salinity of tideland material decreased gradually. However, the rate of decrease gradually diminished with an increase in the operation period. The electrical current increased gradually with the operation time. Ten days of electrokinetic operation decreased the electrical conductivity of the tideland material to 65.5% of the initial value. Sodium was removed completely, but the removal efficiency of chloride was 58.5% after 10 days. The lower removal of chloride was due to the formation of complexes with magnesium and calcium. High concentrations of chloride formed chlorine gas in the anolyte, and aqueous chlorine oxidized the circulation tube. The pH distribution after electrokinetic treatment showed a typical shape, and the change in water content was negligible. The results demonstrate that the electrokinetic process is a suitable means to remove salinity from tidelands.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据