4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Integrated electrokinetic-soil flushing to remove mixed organic and metal contaminants

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED ELECTROCHEMISTRY
卷 40, 期 6, 页码 1269-1279

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10800-010-0102-1

关键词

Remediation; Pollution; Soil; Heavy metals; PAHs; Flushing; Electrokinetics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The integrated use of hydraulic flushing and electrokinetic treatment was investigated for the remediation of silty sand contaminated by both PAHs and heavy metals. The soil was collected from a polluted former manufactured gas plant (MGP). Four bench-scale experiments were conducted to analyze the ability of the combined hydraulic flushing and the electrokinetic treatment for the simultaneous removal of PAHs and heavy metals. Sequential flushing with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) or Igepal CA-720 were tested with or without the simultaneous application of a low intensity direct electric field (1 VDC cm(-1)). The best results were obtained with 0.2 M EDTA flushing in two stages (without and with voltage gradient, 1 VDC cm(-1)), followed by 5% Igepal flushing in two stages (without and with 1 VDC cm(-1)). Heavy metals were removed mainly during the EDTA flushing, with removal efficiencies of about 60% for Zn, 80% for Pb, and 30% for Cu. During Igepal flushing, no heavy metals were removed, but PAHs were removed, including 40% phenanthrene, 30% pyrene, and 20% benzo[a]pyrene. Overall, this study showed that a carefully designed sequential hydraulic flushing scheme with selected chelant and surfactant is needed for the removal of both heavy metals and PAHs from MGP silty sands. Combining electrokinetics with hydraulic flushing may not necessarily improve contaminant removal from such soils.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据