4.7 Article

Developing the global potential of citizen science: Assessing opportunities that benefit people, society and the environment in East Africa

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY
卷 56, 期 2, 页码 274-281

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13279

关键词

conservation: citizen science; Eastern Africa; monitoring; public engagement; science-policy; social capital; sustainable development

资金

  1. British Ecological Society
  2. Tropical Biology Association
  3. Natural Environment Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Citizen science is gaining increasing prominence as a tool for science and engagement. However, despite being a potentially valuable tool for sustainable development, citizen science has little visibility in many developing countries. We undertook a collaborative prioritisation process with experts in conservation and the environment to assess the potential of environmental citizen science in East Africa, including its opportunities, benefits and barriers. This provided principles that are applicable across developing countries, particularly for large-scale citizen science. We found that there was great potential for citizen science to add to our scientific knowledge of natural resources and biodiversity trends. Many of the important benefits of citizen science were for people, as well as the environment directly. Major barriers to citizen science were mostly social and institutional, although projects should also consider access to suitable technology and language barriers. Policy implications. Citizen science can provide data to support decision-making and reporting against international targets. Participation can also provide societal benefits, informing and empowering people, thus supporting the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals. In developing countries, innovation is needed to further develop culturally relevant citizen science that benefits participants and end users. This should be supported through regional networks of stakeholders for sharing best practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据