4.2 Article

Comparison of two attractants to small hive beetles, Aethina tumida, in honey bee colonies

期刊

JOURNAL OF APICULTURAL RESEARCH
卷 47, 期 3, 页码 229-233

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00218839.2008.11101464

关键词

Apis mellifera; honey bee; Aethina tumida; small hive beetle; pest control; beetle trapping; attractant

资金

  1. Almond Board of California
  2. USDA/ARS - CSREES Special Research
  3. CSREES/USDA [SC-1700235]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The small hive beetle Aethina tumida Murray (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae) continues to be a persistent honey bee pest, particularly in the southeastern USA. A small hive beetle (SHB) attractant using pollen substitute inoculated with the yeast Kodamaea ohmeri (NRRL Y-30722) was tested in newly established honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies for its effectiveness over a six month period from May to November 2006. Thirty two test colonies were established with 0.9 kg packages of bees with queens. Eight colonies were placed in each apiary, and colonies received one of three treatments: 1) yeast based attractant 2) apple cider vinegar, a known SHB attractant, and 3) control, consisting of an empty trap. The delivery system for the test was the Hood small hive beetle trap. Both the yeast-based (56.2%), and the cider vinegar attractants (43.4%), increased SHB trapping compared to control traps (0.3%). The yeast based attractant showed an increase in SHB trapping efficiency during the warmer months, July and August. There were more capped brood and fewer beetles in colonies with attractant loaded traps as compared to control traps having no attractant or mineral oil. There was no significant difference in the effect of the two attractants on capped brood and colony beetle numbers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据