4.7 Article

Antimicrobial activity of a novel adhesive containing chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) against the resident microflora in human volunteers

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 69, 期 8, 页码 2224-2229

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dku096

关键词

catheter-related infections; antisepsis; infection control; vascular access; dressing; IV securement; cutaneous flora

资金

  1. Vancive Medical Technologies(TM), an Avery Dennison business

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To evaluate the antimicrobial activity of a new, transparent composite film dressing, whose adhesive contains chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG), against the native microflora present on human skin. CHG-containing adhesive film dressings and non-antimicrobial control film dressings were applied to the skin on the backs of healthy human volunteers without antiseptic preparation. Dressings were removed 1, 4 or 7 days after application. The bacterial populations underneath were measured by quantitative cultures (cylinder-scrub technique) and compared with one another as a function of time. The mean baseline microflora recovery was 3.24 log(10) cfu/cm(2). The mean log reductions from baseline measured from underneath the CHG-containing dressings were 0.87, 0.78 and 1.30 log(10) cfu/cm(2) on days 1, 4 and 7, respectively, compared with log reductions of 0.67, -0.87 and -1.29 log(10) cfu/cm(2) from underneath the control film dressings. There was no significant difference between the log reductions of the two treatments on day 1, but on days 4 and 7 the log reduction associated with the CHG adhesive was significantly higher than that associated with the control adhesive. The adhesive containing CHG was associated with a sustained antimicrobial effect that was not present in the control. Incorporating the antimicrobial into the adhesive layer confers upon it bactericidal properties in marked contrast to the non-antimicrobial adhesive, which contributed to bacterial proliferation when the wear time was a parts per thousand yen4 days.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据