4.7 Article

Analysis of Phase 3 telavancin nosocomial pneumonia data excluding patients with severe renal impairment and acute renal failure

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 69, 期 4, 页码 1119-1126

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkt490

关键词

hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia; HABP; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; telavancin; vancomycin; ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia; VABP

资金

  1. Theravance, Inc.
  2. Astellas Scientific and Medical Affairs, Inc.
  3. Astellas Pharma Europe, Ltd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Telavancin is approved in Europe for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus when other alternatives are not suitable. The approved European prescribing information contraindicates the use of telavancin in patients with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance 30 mL/min, including patients on haemodialysis) and pre-existing acute renal failure owing to the higher observed mortality in these patients. Data from the ATTAIN studies were reanalysed, excluding patients with these contraindicating conditions at baseline. (At the time of submission of this article, the European marketing authorization of telavancin for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia was suspended pending evidence of a new European Medicines Agency-approved supplier. Clinigen Healthcare Ltd, Theravances commercialization partner for telavancin in Europe, is in the process of seeking approval of a new manufacturing source.) A post hoc analysis of data from two Phase 3 ATTAIN trials of telavancin for the treatment of Gram-positive nosocomial pneumonia assessing clinical outcomes and safety. The all-treated population for this analysis represented 84.2 (1266/1503) of the ATTAIN all-treated population. The cure rates in the clinically evaluable population were similar in the telavancin (82.5, 231/280) and vancomycin (81.3, 243/299) groups [treatment difference (95 CI): 1.3 (5.0 to 7.6)], and were consistent with the overall ATTAIN study results. The cure rate was higher in the telavancin than the vancomycin treatment group in microbiologically evaluable patients with only Gram-positive pathogens isolated at baseline [85.0 (130/153) versus 75.2 (109/145), respectively; treatment difference (95 CI): 9.7 (0.618.8)]. The incidences of adverse events were similar between treatment groups and consistent with the overall findings of the ATTAIN study. This analysis demonstrated that in the subset of patients without severe renal impairment or pre-existing acute renal failure, clinical and safety outcomes were similar in the telavancin and vancomycin treatment groups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据