4.7 Article

Rapid single-colony whole-genome sequencing of bacterial pathogens

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 69, 期 5, 页码 1275-1281

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkt494

关键词

infectious diseases; antibiotic resistance; typing

资金

  1. UK Clinical Research Collaboration Translational Infection Research Initiative, Medical Research Council [G1000803]
  2. MRC [G1000803] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Academy of Medical Sciences (AMS) [AMS-CSF4-Torok] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Medical Research Council [G1000803] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As a result of the introduction of rapid benchtop sequencers, the time required to subculture a bacterial pathogen to extract sufficient DNA for library preparation can now exceed the time to sequence said DNA. We have eliminated this rate-limiting step by developing a protocol to generate DNA libraries for whole-genome sequencing directly from single bacterial colonies grown on primary culture plates. We developed our protocol using single colonies of 17 bacterial pathogens responsible for severe human infection that were grown using standard diagnostic media and incubation conditions. We then applied this method to four clinical scenarios that currently require time-consuming reference laboratory tests: full identification and genotyping of salmonellae; identification of bla(NDM-1), a highly transmissible carbapenemase resistance gene, in Klebsiella pneumoniae; detection of genes encoding staphylococcal toxins associated with specific disease syndromes; and monitoring of vaccine targets to detect vaccine escape in Neisseria meningitidis. We validated our single-colony whole-genome sequencing protocol for all 40 combinations of pathogen and selective, non-selective or indicator media tested in this study. Moreover, we demonstrated the clinical value of this method compared with current reference laboratory tests. This advance will facilitate the implementation of whole-genome sequencing into diagnostic and public health microbiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据