4.7 Article

Rapid detection of carbapenemase genes by multiplex real-time PCR

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 67, 期 4, 页码 906-909

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkr563

关键词

resistance; -lactamases; Enterobacteriaceae

资金

  1. Tampa General Hospital-Esoteric Laboratory Testing
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES) [1152/10-6]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To develop a single multiplex real-time PCR assay to detect six different genetic types of carbapenemases already identified in Enterobacteriaceae (KPC, GES, NDM, IMP, VIM and OXA-48). A total of 58 bacterial isolates were tested. Thirty were previously characterized as resistant to carbapenems and documented by PCR and sequencing analysis to carry the following genes: bla(KPC) type, bla(GES) type, bla(IMP) type, bla(VIM) type, bla(OXA-48) and bla(NDM-1). These positive strains included 21 Enterobacteriaceae, 1 Acinetobacter baumannii and 8 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. The remaining 28 isolates previously tested susceptible to carbapenems and were negative for these genes. Bacterial DNA was extracted using the easyMag extractor (bioMrieux, France). The real-time PCR was performed using the Rotor-Gene 6000 instrument (Corbett Life Science, Australia) and specific primers for each carbapenemase target were designed using the DNAStar software (Madison, WI, USA). Each one of the six carbapenemase genes tested presented a different melting curve after PCR amplification. The melting temperature (T-m) analysis of the amplicons identified was as follows: bla(IMP) type (T-m 80.1C), bla(OXA-48) (T-m 81.6C), bla(NDM-1) (T-m 84C), bla(GES) type (T-m 88.6C), bla(VIM) type (T-m 90.3C) and bla(KPC) type (T-m 91.6C). No amplification was detected among the negative samples. The results showed 100 concordance with the genotypes previously identified. The new assay was able to detect the presence of six different carbapenemase gene types in a single 3 h PCR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据