4.7 Article

Transmission of carbapenem-resistant pathogens in New York City hospitals: progress and frustration

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 67, 期 6, 页码 1427-1431

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dks063

关键词

antibiotic resistance; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Acinetobacter baumannii

资金

  1. Achaogen, Inc.
  2. Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  3. Merck Co.
  4. Ortho-McNeil Janssen Pharmaceuticals
  5. Pfizer Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are endemic in many medical centres. Because therapeutic options are limited, understanding the epidemiology and controlling the spread of these pathogens are of paramount importance. Isolates of K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa were collected from 14 hospitals in New York City over a 3 month period in 2009, and analysed for the presence of genes encoding important carbapenemases. Comparisons were made with a similar study conducted in 2006. Demographic and infection control-related information from hospitals was collected. Overall, 29 of K. pneumoniae possessed the carbapenemase KPC, significantly improved from the 38 observed in 2006 (P0.001). However, carbapenem resistance worsened in A. baumannii (mostly due to the emergence of strains with OXA-type carbapenemases) and P. aeruginosa. The decline in KPC-possessing K. pneumoniae was not uniformly observed in all of the hospitals. In a subset analysis of nine hospitals, those with a decreasing prevalence of bla(KPC) had shorter average lengths of stay. Measurable improvement has occurred in reducing the spread of KPC-possessing K. pneumoniae, and reducing the average length of stay may augment infection control efforts. However, the problem of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa lingers. New approaches, including respiratory isolation and environmental cleaning, need to be examined to control the spread of A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据