4.7 Article

Pharmacokinetics and safety of panobacumab: specific adjunctive immunotherapy in critical patients with nosocomial Pseudomonas aeruginosa O11 pneumonia

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 66, 期 5, 页码 1110-1116

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkr046

关键词

ventilator-associated pneumonia; IgM; monoclonal antibody; pharmacokinetics

资金

  1. Kenta Biotech (Bern, Switzerland)
  2. Kenta Biotech

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Nosocomial Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia remains a major concern in critically ill patients. We explored the potential impact of microorganism-targeted adjunctive immunotherapy in such patients. Patients and methods: This multicentre, open pilot Phase 2a clinical trial (NCT00851435) prospectively evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics and potential efficacy of three doses of 1.2 mg/kg panobacumab, a fully human monoclonal anti-lipopolysaccharide IgM, given every 72 h in 18 patients developing nosocomial P. aeruginosa (serotype O11) pneumonia. Results: Seventeen out of 18 patients were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis. In 13 patients receiving three doses, the maximal concentration after the third infusion was 33.9 +/- 8.0 mu g/mL, total area under the serum concentration-time curve was 5397 +/- 1993 mu g h/mL and elimination half-life was 102.3 +/- 47.8 h. Panobacumab was well tolerated, induced no immunogenicity and was detected in respiratory samples. In contrast to Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) prediction, all 13 patients receiving three doses survived, with a mean clinical resolution in 9.0 +/- 2.7 days. Two patients suffered a recurrence at days 17 and 20. Conclusions: These data suggest that panobacumab is safe, with a pharmacokinetic profile similar to that in healthy volunteers. It was associated with high clinical cure and survival rates in patients developing nosocomial P. aeruginosa O11 pneumonia. We concluded that these promising results warrant further trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据