4.7 Article

A novel phenicol exporter gene, fexB, found in enterococci of animal origin

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 67, 期 2, 页码 322-325

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkr481

关键词

florfenicol resistance; fexA; food safety; Gram-positive bacteria

资金

  1. Chinese Universities Scientific Fund [15050102]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1031004, 31001087]
  3. University of China [IRT0866]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To investigate two porcine Enterococcus isolates for the genetic basis of phenicol resistance and to determine the location and the genetic environment of the novel resistance gene. Methods: A total of 391 isolates with reduced florfenicol susceptibility (MIC >= 16 mg/L), obtained from 557 nasal swabs of individual pigs, were screened by PCR for the known florfenicol resistance genes. Isolates that were negative in these PCRs were analysed for their species assignment and antimicrobial susceptibility. Plasmids were extracted and subjected to transformation and conjugation assays. Restriction fragments of the phenicol resistance plasmids were cloned and sequenced. The sequences obtained were analysed and compared with sequences deposited in the databases. Results: The two isolates, Enterococcus faecium EFM-1 and Enterococcus hirae EH-1, exhibited MICs of chloramphenicol and florfenicol of 64 mg/L and carried a new phenicol resistance gene, designated fexB. This gene codes for a phenicol exporter of 469 amino acids organized in 14 transmembrane domains. The fexB gene was located on the 35 kb pEFM-1 from E. faecium and on the 25.3 kb pEH-1 from E. hirae, respectively. Both plasmids were non-conjugative. The fexB gene was found to be embedded in virtually the same genetic environment of 14.8 kb in both plasmids. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of the new florfenicol exporter gene fexB. Based on its plasmid location, horizontal transfer from the enterococci to other bacteria is possible.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据