4.7 Article

Evolution of raltegravir resistance during therapy

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 64, 期 1, 页码 25-32

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkp153

关键词

HIV-1; integrase inhibitors; drug resistance; non-B subtypes; antiviral therapy

资金

  1. BMG [310/4478-02/3]
  2. EU
  3. MSD

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: We investigated the prevalence of raltegravir resistance-associated mutations at baseline and their evolution during raltegravir therapy in patients infected with different HIV-1 subtypes. Methods: At pre-treatment screening, the integrase gene from plasma samples from patients infected with subtype B and non-B viruses was analysed. Raltegravir resistance evolution was further evaluated in 10 heavily pre-treated patients. Results: Two hundred and nine plasma samples from 94 subtype B and 115 non-B patients were sequenced. No signature/primary raltegravir resistance mutations were detected at baseline. The secondary mutations L74M, T97A, V151I and G163R were observed with a frequency of <4%. The primary mutations N155H, Q148R/H or Q143R were observed during raltegravir therapy. The Q148R/H was detected only in subtype B. A switch of the primary mutation during raltegravir treatment was not restricted to the subtype B viruses. The prevalence of each primary mutation varied depending on the length of the raltegravir therapy. The Q148R/H was mostly detected after short exposure to raltegravir, while the Y143R was observed only after prolonged raltegravir exposure. We detected an association between the presence of the T206S in the baseline genotype and the absence of the primary Q148R/H mutation or any secondary mutation accompanying the N155H following raltegravir failure. Conclusions: A number of secondary and additional mutations were found in baseline genotypes. During therapy, when the virus was not optimally suppressed, resistance mutations developed, which were dependent on subtype and time on raltegravir.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据