4.7 Article

Breakthrough in penicillin resistance? Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates with penicillin/cefotaxime MICs of 16 mg/L and their genotypic and geographical relatedness

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 62, 期 6, 页码 1234-1240

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkn392

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To phenotypically and genotypically characterize 11 strains (isolated in four different centres) exhibiting penicillin MIC of 8-32 mg/L among isolates of the SPICE project. Nine isolates were from Romania (9/162; 5.56%) and two from Poland (2/305; 0.66%). In vitro susceptibility was determined in triplicate by microdilution (CLSI guidelines), and additionally, MICs of penicillin, cefotaxime and amoxicillin were confirmed in triplicate by agar dilution. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST), PFGE and gene amplification and sequencing were performed. For the nine Romanian isolates, MICs were >= 16 mg/L for penicillin, cefotaxime and amoxicillin, >= 32 mg/L for cefuroxime and cefpodoxime, 4-8 mg/L for cefditoren and >= 128 mg/L for erythromycin and gentamicin. All isolates were non-susceptible to imipenem (MIC = 0.5-1 mg/L) and susceptible to levofloxacin (MIC = 0.5-1 mg/L) and vancomycin (MIC = 0.25-0.5 mg/L). These Romanian strains presented a new cluster in the 595-600 region of PBP2X (YSGIQL -> LSTPWF) conferring 98% homology with Streptococcus mitis PBP2X, with a new MurM allele (seven strains) with eight amino acid changes versus R6. PBP nucleotide sequences were highly conserved suggesting a common origin. Allelic profiles of two strains gave sequence type 321, three strains exhibited a single- and four a double-locus variance. MLST-predicted serotype was 23F in all but one strain (19F), but three strains were 19A by Quellung. The multidrug high resistance (precluding adequate oral therapy in children), its origin, the prevalence found in Romania and the presence of non-vaccine (7-valent) serotypes should worry the medical community because of a possible clonal diffusion that would limit therapeutic alternatives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据