4.5 Article

5-Aminosalicylic acid downregulates the growth and virulence of Escherichia coli associated with IBD and colorectal cancer, and upregulates host anti-inflammatory activity

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANTIBIOTICS
卷 71, 期 11, 页码 950-961

出版社

JAPAN ANTIBIOTICS RESEARCH ASSOC
DOI: 10.1038/s41429-018-0081-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. Jill Roberts and Jill Roberts Center for IBD, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

5-aminosalicylate (5-ASA) is widely prescribed for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and prevention of inflammation-associated colorectal cancer (CRC). Its clinical effect is widely attributed to modulation of host inflammatory responses. However, the recent association of intestinal dysbiosis and selective enrichment in Escherichia coli in patients with IBD and CRC raises the possibility that 5-ASA might also affect the enteric microflora. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of 5-ASA on the growth and virulence of E. coli associated with IBD and CRC, and its impact on host cell inflammatory responses. Our results show that 5-ASA inhibited E. coli growth in a dose-dependent manner and downregulated the expression of bacterial virulence genes associated with IBD (fliC, fimH, ompC, yfgL, nlpL, lpfA, htrA, dsbA, fyuA, and chuA) and CRC (pks). 5-ASA inhibited E. coli motility (30-70%), epithelial adherence and invasion, and IL-8 secretion (p < 0.05). 5-ASA reduced E. coli survival in J774A.1 macrophages by 20 to 50% (p < 0.01) and TNF-alpha secretion by infected macrophages up to 30% (p < 0.05). In addition, 5-ASA reduced DNA damage in epithelial cells (Caco-2) induced by pks-positive E. coli. Our results reveal a multifaceted and previously unrecognized effect of 5-ASA on the growth and virulence of IBD- and CRC-associated E. coli, in addition to its inhibitory effect on host cell inflammatory responses. These results suggest that 5-ASA may abrogate the proinflammatory and oncogenic effects of E. coli in patients with IBD and CRC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据