4.7 Article

Dynamic changes in digestive capability may contribute to compensatory growth following a nutritional insult in newly weaned pigs

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE
卷 90, 期 -, 页码 236-238

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.2527/jas.53981

关键词

digestive capability; nutritional insult; newly weaned pigs

资金

  1. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (Guelph, ON, Canada),
  2. Ontario Pork (Guelph, ON, Canada),
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Ottawa, ON, Canada)
  4. Canadian Swine Research and Development Cluster

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have previously demonstrated that feeding low complexity diets (LOW) compromises growth performance of pigs during the first 3 wk after weaning and induces compensatory growth and improved feed efficiency thereafter. A study was undertaken to explore physiological mechanisms involved in compensatory growth following a nutritional insult. Fifty-six pigs were weaned at 21 +/- 2 d of age and fed high complexity diets (HIGH) for 6 wk. All pigs received the same grower diet thereafter. Pigs were killed at weeks 2, 4, and 8 after weaning and proximal jejunum and distal ileum were sampled for evaluation of histology and enzyme activity. In the proximal jejunum, villus height was lower (P = 0.03) at week 2 in pigs on LOW than HIGH but not different at week 4. There was no effect of diet on crypt depth; villus height: crypt depth ratio increased (P = 0.02) from week 2 to week 4 in pigs on LOW but was not changed in pigs on HIGH. Diet did not impact gut morphology at the distal ileum. Enzyme activity was lowest (P < 0.05) at week 2 for sucrase and aminopeptidase N (APN) and lowest (P < 0.06) at week 8 for lactase. Sucrase activity was numerically higher at week 4 in pigs fed LOW but numerically higher at week 8 in pigs fed HIGH. Lactase and APN activity were not affected by diet. Compensatory growth observed in pigs following a nutritional insult after weaning may be due in part to improved digestive capability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据