4.7 Article

Detection of chromosome segments of zebu and taurine origin and their effect on beef production and growth

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE
卷 89, 期 7, 页码 2050-2060

出版社

AMER SOC ANIMAL SCIENCE
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2010-3363

关键词

chromosome segment; genome-wide association study; haplotype; single nucleotide polymorphism; taurine; zebu

资金

  1. Cooperative Research Centre for Beef Genetic Technologies (Armidale, New South Wales, Australia)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cattle in breeds formed by recent crossing of Bos taurus (Bt) and Bos indicus (Bi) subspecies should contain chromosomes that are a composite of Bt and Bt segments. Using data from a 50K SNP chip, we were able to identify whether a chromosome segment of 11 SNP in a composite animal descended from a Bt or a Bi ancestor. When the method was tested in purebred Bt or Brahman cattle, about 94% of segments were assigned correctly. About 10% of the genome in Australian Brahman cattle appears to be of Bt origin, as might be expected from their history. We then examined the effect of the origin of each chromosome segment on BW in a population of 515 Bt x Bi composite cattle and found 67 chromosome segments with a significant (P < 0.01) effect. We confirmed these effects by examining these 67 segments in a population of Brahman cattle and in a population of mixed breeds including composite breeds such as Santa Gertrudis and Brahman cattle. About 66% of the 67 segments had an effect in the same direction in the confirmation analyses as in the discovery population. However, the effect on BW and other traits of chromosome segment origin is small, indicating that we had low power to detect these effects with the number of animals available. Consequently, when chromosome segment origin was used in genomic selection to predict BW, the accuracy was low (0.08). Chromosome segments that had a positive effect on BW tend to be at greater frequency in composite breeds than chromosome segments with a negative effect on BW.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据