4.7 Article

Porcine peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta mediates the lipolytic effects of dietary fish oil to reduce body fat deposition

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE
卷 88, 期 6, 页码 2009-2018

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2009-2597

关键词

adipose tissue; fish oil; lipid metabolism; peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta; pig; polyunsaturated fatty acid

资金

  1. National Science Council in Taiwan, Republic of China
  2. National Taiwan University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta promotes fatty acid catabolism and energy expenditure in skeletal muscle and adipose tissues. A ligand for PPAR delta is required to activate PPAR delta function. Polyunsaturated fatty acids are potential ligands for PPAR delta activation. The current experiment was designed to determine the potential for PUFA, particularly from dietary fish oil, to activate porcine PPAR delta in vivo. Transgenic mice were generated to overexpress porcine PPAR delta in the adipose tissue. Mice were fed a high-saturated fat (13% beef tallow), or high-unsaturated fat (13% fish oil) diet, or a diet containing 4 mg/kg of a PPAR delta ligand (L165041) for 4 mo. Compared with beef tallow feeding, fish oil feeding reduced fat mass and decreased (P < 0.05) plasma triacylglycerol and FFA concentrations in the transgenic mice. Adipose tissue expression of genes involved in adipogenesis (i.e., lipoprotein lipase and adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein) was decreased in transgenic mice fed fish oil or the PPAR delta ligand. In the same mice, expression of the lipolytic gene, hormone-sensitive lipase was increased (P < 0.05). Fish oil feeding also stimulated expression of genes participating in fatty acid oxidation in the liver of transgenic mice compared with wild-type mice. Overall, these results indicate that PUFA may serve as natural and effective regulators of lipid catabolism in vivo and many of these effects may be generated from activation of PPAR delta.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据