4.6 Article

Building integral projection models: a user's guide

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY
卷 83, 期 3, 页码 528-545

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12178

关键词

mathematical model; Soay Sheep; structured population; integral projection model

资金

  1. NERC [DZC -NE/I022027/1]
  2. Leverhulme
  3. Max Plank Institute for Demographic Research (MPIDR
  4. Rostock, Germany)
  5. NERC [NE/G004854/1, NE/I022027/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/G004854/1, NE/I022027/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to understand how changes in individual performance (growth, survival or reproduction) influence population dynamics and evolution, ecologists are increasingly using parameterized mathematical models. For continuously structured populations, where some continuous measure of individual state influences growth, survival or reproduction, integral projection models (IPMs) are commonly used. We provide a detailed description of the steps involved in constructing an IPM, explaining how to: (i) translate your study system into an IPM; (ii) implement your IPM; and (iii) diagnose potential problems with your IPM. We emphasize how the study organism's life cycle, and the timing of censuses, together determine the structure of the IPM kernel and important aspects of the statistical analysis used to parameterize an IPM using data on marked individuals. An IPM based on population studies of Soay sheep is used to illustrate the complete process of constructing, implementing and evaluating an IPM fitted to sample data. We then look at very general approaches to parameterizing an IPM, using a wide range of statistical techniques (e.g. maximum likelihood methods, generalized additive models, nonparametric kernel density estimators). Methods for selecting models for parameterizing IPMs are briefly discussed. We conclude with key recommendations and a brief overview of applications that extend the basic model. The online Supporting Information provides commented R code for all our analyses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据