4.6 Article

Ecological opportunities and intraspecific competition alter trophic niche specialization in an opportunistic stream predator

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY
卷 83, 期 5, 页码 1025-1034

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12208

关键词

competition; individual performances; inter-individual variability; riparian land-use; stable isotope analyses; trophic subsidies

资金

  1. French national program 'Biodiversite, Gestion Forestiere, et Politiques Publiques' (SYLECOL research project)
  2. 'ERG Marie Curie' grant [PERG08-GA-2010-276969]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1. Many generalist populations are composed of specialized individuals that use a narrow part of the population's niche. Ecological theories predict that individual specialization and population trophic niche are determined by biotic interactions and resource diversity emerging from environmental variations (i. e. ecological opportunities). However, due to the paucity of empirical and experimental demonstrations, the genuine importance of each of these drivers in determining trophic niche attributes is not fully appreciated. 2. The present study aimed at determining the population level and individual responses of brown trout (Salmo trutta) to variations in ecological opportunities (terrestrial prey inputs) and autochthonous prey communities among 10 stream reaches along a riparian condition gradient using individual longitudinal monitoring and stable isotope analyses. 3. Our results suggested that trophic niche diversity varied along the environmental gradient, while individual trophic specialization was indirectly driven by ecological opportunities through strengthened intraspecific competition. Individual diet was repeatable over the study period, and the growth rate of juvenile brown trout increased with their specialization for aquatic predatory invertebrates. 4. Our findings highlight the dual influences of intraspecific competition and ecological opportunities on individual trophic specialization and population trophic niche.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据