4.6 Editorial Material

Accounting for individual behavioural variation in studies of habitat selection

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY
卷 83, 期 2, 页码 319-321

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12200

关键词

-

资金

  1. Direct For Biological Sciences
  2. Division Of Environmental Biology [1145522] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  3. Division Of Environmental Biology
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [1145902] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  6. Directorate For Geosciences [0745606] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A caribou wearing an animal-borne video camera (a) and animal-borne video footage taken from systems deployed on mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) in north-central Washington state, USA (b-d). When paired with tracking technology, animal-borne video can reveal detailed information about behaviour and environmental features at each location: (b) feeding, (c) vigilant in the open, (d) vigilant in cover, (e) resting in the open. Accordingly, animal-borne video systems should allow for analyses of habitat selection by individuals in particular behavioural states. image In Focus: DeCesare, N.J., Hebblewhite, M., Bradley, M., Hervieux, D., Neufeld, L. & Musiani, M. (2014) Linking habitat selection and predation risk to spatial variation in survival. Journal of Animal Ecology, 83, 343-352. Resource selection is often assumed to confer enhanced fitness, but this assumption is rarely examined. In a study involving woodland caribou subject to grey wolf predation, DeCesare etal. (2014) show that while patterns of selection by caribou did correspond with a fitness proxy (survival probability), individuals did not avoid wolf predation risk to the extent that would minimize mortality. Here, we use the results of this paper as a springboard for discussing the choice of fitness proxies and the need to account for individual behavioural variation in studies of resource selection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据