4.7 Article

Nondestructive analysis of faience beads from the Western Zhou Dynasty, excavated from Peng State cemetery, Shanxi Province, China

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY
卷 29, 期 8, 页码 1438-1443

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ja00031e

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40802002]
  2. CAS Strategic Priority Research Program [XDA05130303]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry
  4. UCAS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The faience in China suddenly appeared in the Western Zhou Dynasty (1046-771 BC), and its production is considered to be influenced by the West. In this paper, the microstructure and chemical compositions obtained by synchrotron radiation micro-computed tomography (SR-mu CT) and mu-probe energy dispersion X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (EDXRF) were combined to disclose the manufacturing information of faience beads excavated from Peng State cemetery in Hengshui, Shanxi Province, China, dated to the Western Zhou Dynasty (1046-771 BC). Based on inner structural features obtained by SR-mu CT, it was found that these faience beads could be divided into two types: glazed faience and glassy faience. According to the structural information revealed by the CT slices, it is inferred that these beads were first formed on an organic cylinder and then glazed using the direct application method. The possible sources of copper colorant are copper ores. In addition, the glaze chemical compositions are distinct from Na2O-CaO-SiO2 glaze or glass in the West, and thus, Western Zhou faience should have an indigenous origin in China. Furthermore, the manufacturing features are consistent with the techniques of proto-porcelain during the same time period, but the glaze recipe is distinct from that of proto-porcelain and early glass in China. Consequently, it is proposed that faience in the Western Zhou Dynasty was not the precursor of early glass in China.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据