4.7 Article

Evaluation of sample preparation procedures and krypton as an interference standard probe for arsenic speciation by HPLC-ICP-QMS

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY
卷 28, 期 8, 页码 1303-1310

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3ja50099c

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [2006/59083-9, 2010/50238-5]
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  3. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Different conditions of extraction using water, a methanol-water mixture and nitric acid solutions were evaluated for speciation of As(III), As(V), DMA and MMA in plant samples that previously received As(V) after being sown and emergence was investigated. Microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) using diluted nitric acid solutions was also performed for arsenic extraction from chicken feed samples. The separation and determination of arsenic species were performed using HPLC-ICP-MS. The interference standard method (IFS) using Kr-83(+) as the IFS probe was employed to minimize spectral interferences caused by polyatomic species, such as (ArCl+)-Ar-40-Cl-35. The extraction procedures tested presented adequate extraction efficiencies (90%), and the four arsenic species evaluated were found in plant samples. Extractions with diluted nitric acid solution at 90 degrees C were the most efficient strategy, with quantitative recoveries for all four As species in plant tissues. On the other hand, the methanol-water mixture was the solvent with the lowest extraction efficiency (50-60%). For chicken feed samples, MAE at 100 degrees C for 30 min resulted in an extraction efficiency of 97% and only As(V) was found, without any species interconversion. The IFS method contributed to improving precision and limits of detection and quantification for all tested extraction procedures. Significant improvements on accuracy were obtained by applying the IFS method and recoveries between 77 and 94%, and 82 and 93% were obtained for plant extracts and chicken feed samples, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据