4.6 Article

Nanotextured polymer substrates show enhanced cancer cell isolation and cell culture

期刊

NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 26, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/26/22/225101

关键词

RNA aptamers; nanotextured substrates; reactive ion etching; PDMS; microfluidics; human glioblastoma; basement membrane

资金

  1. Cancer Research Foundation of North Texas
  2. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys
  3. Directorate For Engineering [1407990] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in the early stages of cancer is a great challenge because of their exceedingly small concentration. There are only a few approaches sensitive enough to differentiate tumor cells from the plethora of other cells in a sample like blood. In order to detect CTCs, several antibodies and aptamers have already shown high affinity. Nanotexture can be used to mimic basement membrane to further enhance this affinity. This article reports an approach to fabricate nanotextured polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrates using micro reactive ion etching (micro-RIE). Three recipes were used to prepare nanotextured PDMS using oxygen and carbon tetrafluoride. Micro-RIE provided better control on surface properties. Nanotexturing improved the affinity of PDMS surfaces to capture cancer cells using surface immobilized aptamers against cell membrane overexpressed with epidermal growth factor receptors. In all cases, nanotexture of PDMS increased the effective surface area by creating nanoscale roughness on the surface. Nanotexture also enhanced the growth rate of cultured cells compared to plain surfaces. A comparison among the three nanotextured surfaces demonstrated an almost linear relationship between the surface roughness and density of captured tumor cells. The nanotextured PDMS mimicked biophysical environments for cells to grow faster. This can have many implications in microfluidic platforms used for cell handling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据