4.7 Article

Mercury speciation with L-cysteine functionalized cellulose fibre as adsorbent by atomic fluorescence spectrometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY
卷 26, 期 3, 页码 613-617

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c0ja00185f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21075013, 21005011, 21005013, 20725517, 20821120292]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [N090105001, N090405004, N090605001, N100305003, N100305004, N100605002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

d The functionalization of cellulose fibre by grafting L-cysteine on the surface (Cys-fibre) significantly improves the sorption capacity toward mercury and methyl-mercury. The Cys-fibre is used to pack a mini-column for on-line separation and preconcentration of mercury species in a sequential injection system. The retained mercury and methyl-mercury could readily be recovered by a mixture of L-cysteine and nitric acid. The inorganic mercury is selectively quantified using the cold atomization mode with vapor generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry. The total amount of mercury is determined by adopting the flame/heat atomization mode, and thus the concentration of methyl-mercury is achieved by the difference. When 1000 mL of sample solution is processed followed by elution with 100 mL of eluent, detection limits of 1 ng L-1 (3 sigma, n = 9) for inorganic mercury and 3 ng L-1 (3 sigma, n = 9) for methylmercury are obtained within linear ranges of 0.01-0.7 mg L-1 Hg2+ and 0.03-2.0 mg L-1 MeHg, respectively. The precisions for Hg2+ and MeHg of 1.5% RSD (n = 11) and 2.6% RSD (n = 9) are recorded at 0.1 mg L-1 and 1.0 mg L-1, respectively. The procedure has been validated by analyzing mercury in certified reference material of BCR176 and a cosmetic sample. Speciation of mercury and methyl-mercury in a series of water samples and the extracts of cosmetic and seaweed samples are performed, and favorable spiking recoveries have been demonstrated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据