4.7 Article

Low-memory, small sample size, accurate and high-precision determinations of lithium isotopic ratios in natural materials by MC-ICP-MS

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY
卷 25, 期 7, 页码 1019-1024

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b926327f

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSC
  2. MOE, Taiwan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Here we report a comparatively simple, rapid, high-precision and accurate technique for the Li isotope ratio determination by MC-ICP-MS. In comparison with published methods, our MC-ICP-MS technique uses a low-memory APEX-IR desolvator and a high-sensitivity X-skimmer cone, together with a simple one-step column separation, to achieve an optimal condition for Li isotope determination in natural materials with different matrices at low levels of Li. This new method was validated by analyzing a series of certified reference materials, which span a wide range of delta Li-7 and cover different sample matrices in order to provide a useful benchmark for future works. On the basis of this approach, the long-term precision of delta Li-7 (+/- 0.12 parts per thousand, 2SD, n = 46) was significantly improved by a factor of 2 compared to other methods, with the additional advantage of requiring a rather small size of ca. 1.2 ng Li. The delta Li-7 for several reference standards were determined, including Li2CO3 (IRMM-016: 0.05 parts per thousand), seawater (IAPSO: 30.84 parts per thousand; NASS-5: 30.72 parts per thousand), coastal waters (CASS-4: 30.69 parts per thousand; SLEW-3: 30.45 parts per thousand), river water (NIST SRM 1640: 9.36 parts per thousand), coral standard (JCp-1: 20.16 parts per thousand) and two silicate rocks (AGV-2: 7.98 parts per thousand and BHVO-2: 4.63 parts per thousand). Applying the improved technique, we are able to produce accurate and high-precision delta Li-7 data for low [Li] natural materials, such as continental runoffs and marine biogenic carbonates, which can provide valuable information on continental weathering processes and paleoceanographic implications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据