4.7 Article

Evaluation of a glow discharge chamber coupled to time of flight mass spectrometry for the analysis of small gas volumes and bubbles in glass

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY
卷 25, 期 10, 页码 1612-1617

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c0ja00001a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Gobierno del Principado de Asturias [PC07-013]
  2. EU [CTQ2006-02309]
  3. Ministry of Education and Science of Spain

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glow discharge time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GD-TOFMS) is becoming a powerful tool not only for simultaneous elemental determinations but also for possible molecular analysis of solid and gaseous samples. In this work, a modified in-house GD ion source, operated with radiofrequency (rf) power and coupled to an orthogonal TOFMS, is investigated for the analysis of small volumes of gaseous samples. Moreover, the results are compared with those obtained using a previous GD source design containing an internal flow tube. The modified in-house GD ion source has a reduced internal volume and no flow tube built in, allowing the use of lower gas flow rates. Additionally, this design allows the GD source to be placed closer to the sampler cone of the MS, resulting in improved ion transport efficiency. Limits of detection obtained for the analysis of small volumes of gas, turned out to be more than one order of magnitude better when using this modified in-house GD ion source. Furthermore, the pulsed mode of the rf-GD system (both, in millisecond and microsecond regimes) has been investigated to further improve the analytical performance of the technique for small gas volumes analysis. Calibration curves are obtained for the selected molecular compounds including nitrogen, oxygen and carbon dioxide. The results show that the limits of detection can be further improved by using a 100 mu s-pulsed-rf-GD-TOFMS system, where limits of detection observed were below nanolitre for molecular nitrogen and oxygen, and below picolitre for carbon dioxide.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据