4.7 Article

Solution cathode glow discharge induced vapor generation of iodine for determination by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY
卷 25, 期 9, 页码 1390-1394

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b927298d

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation China [20905066]
  2. Natural Sciences Fund of Hubei Province [2009CDB106]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel vapor-generation technique is described for iodine determination in aqueous solutions. The iodide and iodate in the solution are converted to volatile iodine vapor through solution cathode glow discharge induced advanced redox processes. It is achieved by in situ produced highly reactive chemical species in the discharge, thereby eliminating the need for externally supplied sources of any redox reagents. Iodine vapor is readily generated from a background electrolyte containing 0.01 mol L-1 HNO3. The generated iodine vapor is then transported to inductively coupled plasma for determination by optical emission spectrometry. The influences of the background electrolyte, pH, discharge voltage, carrier gas flow rate and ICP power were examined. The detection limits of plasma induced vapor generation for KI and KIO3 were 0.30 and 0.43 mu g L-1, respectively. The repeatability, expressed as the relative standard deviation (n = 11) of a 0.05 mg L-1 standard, was 1.2% for KI and 1.9% for KIO3. Compared with conventional vapor generation technology, it offers several advantages. First, it eliminates the need for redox regents, and thus minimizes a source of contamination as well as hazards. Second, it is applicable to both iodide and iodate determination. In addition to iodide, iodate could also be directly converted to volatile iodine vapor without prior reduction. The method is sensitive and simple in operation, and requires no auxiliary reagents, served as a useful alternative to conventional vapor generation for trace iodine determination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据