4.7 Article

Generalized model of n-heptane pyrolysis and steam cracking kinetics based on automated reaction network generation

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL AND APPLIED PYROLYSIS
卷 109, 期 -, 页码 159-167

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2014.06.017

关键词

n-Heptane; Pyrolysis; Steam cracking; Kinetic model; Reaction network generation

资金

  1. Ministry of Education Youths and Sports of the Czech Republic [20/2013]
  2. VEGA Scientific Grant Agency of the Slovak Republic [1/0228/12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mathematical model of n-heptane pyrolysis under thermal cracking and steam cracking conditions was developed. The objective was achieving good generalization by combining two different data sources for model identification. The data sources included experimental pyrolysis data for many structurally different hydrocarbons measured at reference conditions as well as the data for n-heptane measured in different reactors at different reaction conditions. The model was developed using the automated reaction network generation. The generated network included hydrogen abstraction, beta-scission, radical isomerization and recombination reactions, the kinetic parameters of which were expressed as functions of 26 group contribution factors. Molecular reactions and radical additions were substituted by 12 formal shortcut molecular reactions. The initial values of kinetic parameters and group contribution factors were adopted from previous study, where they were obtained by regression based on the experimental data involving wide range of linear, branched and/or cyclic hydrocarbons. More experimental data on n-heptane pyrolysis measured under different conditions, including the use of two different reactors, were added to the data set used for the parameter optimization. The model simulations showed good agreement with the experimental data even for the validation samples. Thus, the proposed approach proved the ability to produce models achieving good generalization. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据