4.7 Article

Influence of pyrolysis temperature and holding time on properties of biochar derived from medicinal herb (radix isatidis) residue and its effect on soil CO2 emission

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL AND APPLIED PYROLYSIS
卷 110, 期 -, 页码 277-284

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2014.09.016

关键词

Pyrolysis; Biochar; Radix isatidis; Soil CO2 emission

资金

  1. National 973 Project of China [2011CB201501]
  2. National Science and Technology Program of the Twelfth Five-year Plan for rural development in China [2012BAD14B16-04]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51161140330]
  4. Pearl River Nova Program of Guangzhou [2013J2200008]
  5. Consejo de Ciencia y Tecnologia del Estado de Tabasco [2012B091400011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Radix isatidis is a wide-spread medicinal herb in China. The boiled radix isatidis residue contains considerable quantities of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin that could be used as feedstock for biochar production. This study aims to investigate the influence of pyrolysis temperature and holding time on biochar properties as well as the effect of biochar on soil CO2 emission in southern China. The biochar was prepared using pyrolysis over a temperature range of 300-700 degrees C and a holding time span of 10-180 min. The incubation experiment of soil incorporated with biochar lasted for 46 days. Increasing temperature and prolonging holding time were found to reduce the volatile matter content, strengthen the carbon enrichment, and grow aromatic structure, producing alkaline biochar that has weak surface polarity, high specific surface area and extensively porous structures. The effect of biochar on soil CO2 emission in southern China lays in the combined actions of biochar properties, especially of volatile matter, porous structure, and pH. Increasing temperature and extending holding time may convert the positive effect into a negative effect and reduce soil CO2 emission. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据