4.7 Article

Pretreatment of agricultural residues for co-gasification via torrefaction

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL AND APPLIED PYROLYSIS
卷 86, 期 2, 页码 331-337

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2009.08.006

关键词

Torrefaction; Agricultural residues; Kinetic; Co-gasification

资金

  1. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [071607023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Torrefaction is a main pretreatment technology for improving the properties of agricultural biomass in order to deal with such problems as high bulk volume, high moisture content and poor grindability. Two typical agricultural residues, rice straw and rape stalk were torrefied in a vertical reactor at 200 degrees C, 250 degrees C and 300 degrees C for 30 min, under inert atmosphere. The product distribution profiles of solid, liquid and gases were obtained. The grindability of the torrefied biomass was evaluated by the particle size distribution after being milled in a ball mill. It was found that temperature strongly affected the torrefied biomass and the type of feedstock influenced the conversion rate due to the different volatile content in raw biomass. An increase of torrefaction temperature leads to a decrease in solid bio-char yield and an increasing yield in the volatile matters including liquid and non-condensable gases. The maximum increase of the heating value of the torrefied residue compared with the raw material is 17% for the rice straw and 15% for the rape stalk, respectively. On the other hand, the torrefied residues are liable to be pulverized. A kinetic study on the generation of main non-condensable gases was accomplished, which shows that the gases are formed through parallel independent first-order reactions. The kinetic characteristic parameters for the generation of each gas were determined. A novel method which combined torrefaction with co-gasification to improve the efficiency of biomass utilization is promising. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据